Glyph outline adjustment while rendering

ABSTRACT

Methods and apparatus, including computer program products, that implement a method for adjusting a glyph outline while rendering. In one aspect a method includes receiving a glyph to be rendered at a size; generating from the glyph an outline of line segments, each line segment having two endpoints; translating the line segments all in an outward or inward direction, each line segment being moved by a distance and then rejoining pairs of adjacent line segments by extending or trimming their endpoints until each pair of adjacent line segments join at an intersection point that is an endpoint of each the line segments of the pair; and determining an augmented scaled outline of the glyph from the translated and rejoined line segments.

CROSS-RELATED TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part application of, and claimspriority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/816,582, entitled “EdgeDetection Based Stroke Adjustment”, to R. David Arnold and Terence S.Dowling, filed Mar. 31, 2004. This application also claims priority toU.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/714,551, entitled “GlyphOutline Adjustment While Rendering”, filed on Sep. 13, 2005. Thedisclosures of the above applications are incorporated herein byreference in their entirety.

BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to rendering strokes, including glyphsformed from one or more strokes.

A character is an abstract construct that often represents an atomicunit in some system of expression, such as a language. Each charactercan be represented by a set of character attributes that define thesemantic information of the character. A character encoding associatesthe set of character attributes for a character with a particularencoding value—for example, a scalar value included in a character setstandard, such as ASCII (American Standard Code for InformationInterchanges) or Unicode.

A glyph is a visual representation of a character, such as a graphicaltoken or symbol, and includes one or more strokes, which may be verticalor horizontal (sometimes referred to as vertical and horizontal stems),curved or angled. A glyph image is a particular image of a glyph thathas been rasterized or otherwise imaged onto some display surface. Afont is a collection of glyphs, and can include a mapping of thecollection of glyphs to corresponding characters (i.e., to encodingvalues). A font is typically constructed to support a character setstandard. That is, fonts include glyphs representing characters includedin the character set standard. A glyph can be associated with a set ofglyph attributes defining appearance information for a representation ofthe corresponding character, and the glyph provides the informationnecessary to render a corresponding glyph image. A glyph can include, orcan be associated with, a set of instructions for rendering the glyph.For example, TrueType™ fonts, available from Microsoft Corporation ofRedmond, Wash., include glyphs that are associated with a set ofinstructions for use when rendering the glyph.

Hinting is a method of defining which pixels are turned on in order tocreate the best possible glyph bitmap shape, particularly at small sizesand low resolutions. A glyph's outline determines which pixels willconstitute the bitmap. It is often necessary to modify the outline tocreate the bitmap, i.e., modify the outline until the desiredcombination of pixels is turned on. The modified outline can be referredto as a hinted outline. In certain fonts, such as TrueType fonts, a hintis a mathematical instruction that is included in the font program thatdefines a distortion of a glyph's outline at particular sizes. In otherfonts, such as Type 1 fonts available from Adobe Systems Incorporated(“Adobe”) of San Jose, Calif., a glyph outline may be hinted accordingto various hinting policies. Hinting of Type 1 fonts is described inSection 5 of a manual entitled “Adobe Type 1 Format”, Version 1.1available from Adobe. The term “Type 1” as used herein includesfont/glyph definitions that are derived from or an enhancement of theAdobe Type 1 font format.

Certain types of visual output devices for computer systems are capableof outputting in “gray scale”. That is, each of the pixels in the rastermatrix of the output device is capable of displaying a number of tones,typically from pure light to pure dark (which may or may not be shadesof gray, per se). Anti-aliasing is a technique of varying the gray scaleor color values of the pixels representing a glyph image to provide theillusion of smoother curves and less jagged diagonal lines.

As illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2, an anti-aliasing technique candownsample a high resolution bitmap 105 to generate a gray scalerepresentation 205 of a glyph image, the gray scale representationhaving varying tones of gray. For example, the ratio of the highresolution of the bitmap to the device resolution can be 4 to 1 in bothx and y directions, illustrated by the grid 110 shown in FIG. 1, whichgrid corresponds to the device resolution. The device resolution is themaximum number of individual pixels that can be displayed on the deviceused to display the corresponding glyph image, and may be expressed as“dots per inch”, e.g., 96 dpi.

Before digital typography and scalable type, a font typically had aunique design for each glyph at each size. While the designs atdifferent sizes were similar, important differences existed. As the sizeof a glyph became smaller, the relative size of the stems increased andthe relative spacing between glyphs increased. These differences can becollectively referred to as optical compensation. However, with theadvent of digital typography and the implications of “what you see iswhat you get” (WYSIWYG) and linear scaling, the optical size refinementin type design was largely lost. There are exceptions. For example,MultipleMaster fonts available from Adobe may have an optical size axis,or an individual type design can be implemented for different designsizes. However, even these techniques do not work well for final formdocuments that may be displayed at different zoom levels.

FIG. 3A shows this effect by comparing two variants of the letter “R”from the Type 1 SanvitoMM font. The SanvitoMM font contains fourdesigns: a light 6 point design, a bold 6 point design, a light 72 pointdesign and a bold 72 point design. The dotted outline 300 represents aglyph outline using the SanvitoMM light 6 point design, and the solidoutline 305 represents a glyph outline using the SanvitoMM light 72point design. For illustrative purposes, the outlines 300, 305 have beenscaled to a common size so that the relative differences are more easilycompared and have a common origin 310. The glyph outline 305 rendered atthe 72 point size is positioned to the left (relative to the outline300) and has a relatively smaller advance width 315 than the advancewidth 320 of the glyph outline 300 rendered at the 6 point size. Theglyph outline 300 intended for the smaller point size has a relativelylarger overall width and wider strokes. FIG. 3B shows the same two glyphoutlines 300, 305 with their origins adjusted so that just the outlinedesign differences may more easily be compared.

If, rather than drawing the glyph outline 300 using the SanvitoMM light6 point design, the glyph outline 305 drawn using the SanvitoMM light 72point design is scaled down to a 6 point size, the relative overallwidth will not be relatively larger nor will the strokes be relativelywider than the glyph outline drawn at 72 point size (because it is thesame glyph outline). That is, the strokes will be too narrow (relativelyspeaking) when scaled down to a 6 point size. When applying conventionalanti-aliasing techniques to such narrow strokes, the strokes tend tofade, which can adversely affect readability of the resulting displayedglyph. Adjustment techniques have been used to counter fading, such asan adjustment technique described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,929,866 to R. DavidArnold entitled “Adjusting Contrast in Anti-Aliasing”. Arnold describesa technique for adjusting the density values of pixels representing aglyph up to the maximum density value available from the output device.

SUMMARY

The present invention provides methods and apparatus, including computerprogram products, for rendering strokes, including glyphs formed fromone or more strokes. A glyph being rendered can be adjusted to improvereadability, to produce a bold appearance, and/or to produce a syntheticlight appearance. Adjustment can be effected by an edge detection basedtechnique, an improved smear bold technique, or an outline adjustmenttechnique. Adjustment can be for augmentation or for erosion.

In general, in one aspect, the invention features a method and computerprogram product that implements the method, where the method includesreceiving a glyph for display at a size on a raster output device;receiving a grid ratio, the grid ratio specifying an integer number offine pixels of a high resolution grid that correspond to a device pixelof a raster of the output device; rendering the glyph at the size on thehigh resolution grid, the high resolution grid including fine pixelsmarked to represent the glyph and fine pixels that are unmarked;determining for each line of pixels of the high resolution grid, aline-specific, per-transition adjustment number; and, in each line ofpixels of the high resolution grid, marking or erasing theline-specific, per-transition adjustment number of fine pixels in thehigh resolution grid at each transition from a marked fine pixel to anunmarked fine pixel in a particular direction of the line of pixels.

Particular advantageous embodiments of the invention include one or moreof the following features. The glyph is associated with a font, whereindetermining the line-specific, per-transition adjustment number includesobtaining a standard stem width of the font; calculating a scaled stemwidth for the glyph by scaling the standard stem width to the size atwhich the glyph is to be displayed on the raster output device;calculating an adjustment number from the scaled stem width; anddetermining an integer line-specific, per-transition adjustment number,the determining being based at least on the adjustment number.Determining the integer line-specific, per-transition adjustment numberincludes defining a pattern of the adjustment number of fine pixels fordistribution among lines of fine pixels of the high resolution grid; andusing the pattern to select, for each line of fine pixels in the highresolution grid, the integer number of fine pixels to be marked orerased at each transition from a marked fine pixel to an unmarked finepixel in a particular direction. The pattern is a form of dithering inwhich the line-specific, per-transition adjustment number does not varyby more than one fine pixel from one line of fine pixels to a next lineof fine pixels. The calculating of the adjustment number is based on oneof a function for providing synthetic bold, a function for providingsynthetic light, or a function providing optical compensation. Thefunction for providing synthetic bold and the function for providingsynthetic light each defines a linear relationship between adjustmentnumber and scaled stem width. The function for optical compensationdefines an inversely proportional relationship between adjustment numberand scaled stem width. Calculating an adjustment number includescalculating a component for producing a synthetic bold appearance or asynthetic light appearance; calculating a component for opticalcompensation, the calculating of the component for optical compensationaccounting for the component for producing a bold appearance or thecomponent for producing the synthetic light; and combining thecomponents. The grid ratio specifies a number of rows of fine pixelsthat correspond to a height of the device pixel. The line of fine pixelsis a row in the high resolution grid. The adjustment number determinedbased on the scaled stem width is a first adjustment number. The methodfurther comprises calculating a second adjustment number by dividing thefirst adjustment number by the number of rows of fine pixelscorresponding to the height of the device pixel; when the secondadjustment number is not an integer, selecting two integers that delimitthe second adjustment number; defining a pattern of a number ofinstances of the two integers, a sum of values of the instances in thepattern equaling the first adjustment number, the number of instancesequaling the number of rows of fine pixels corresponding to the heightof the device pixel; and selecting, based on the pattern, one of the twointegers as the line-specific, per-transition adjustment number.Obtaining the integer number includes calculating an adjustment numberfrom the size at which the glyph is to be displayed, wherein size isexpressed as either points per em or pixels per em; and determining theline-specific, per-transition adjustment number, the determining beingbased at least on the adjustment number. The high resolution grid isstored in a digital memory as a bitmap. Rendering the glyph includesadding unmarked fine pixels to an edge of the bitmap to allow for themarking or erasing. The method further comprises adjusting a bitmapmetric after the marking or erasing. The marking or erasing areperformed by a rasterizer during rendering, the rasterizer being is afirst component of a renderer. The method further comprises downsamplingthe bitmap representing the adjusted version of the glyph. Thedownsampling is performed by a downsampler that is a second component ofthe renderer.

In general, in another aspect, the invention features a method andcomputer program product that implements the method, where the methodincludes receiving a glyph to be rendered at a size; generating from theglyph an outline of line segments, each line segment having twoendpoints; translating the line segments all in an outward or inwarddirection, each line segment being moved by a distance and thenrejoining pairs of adjacent line segments by extending or trimming theirendpoints until each pair of adjacent line segments join at anintersection point that is an endpoint of each the line segments of thepair; and determining an augmented scaled outline of the glyph from thetranslated and rejoined line segments.

Particular advantageous embodiments of the invention include one or moreof the following features. The outward or inward direction in which eachline segment is translated is perpendicular to the line segment. Theinward or outward directions which a line segment can be translated isclassified as one of a predetermined set of cardinal directions, and thedistance which the line segment is moved is based on a classification ofthe direction in which the line segment is moved. The cardinaldirections are up, down, left, right, between up and right, between upand left, between down and left, and between down and right. Thedistance which a line segment is moved is represented by a horizontalcomponent and a vertical component, and the line segment is moved bymoving each endpoint of the line segment by the horizontal component andby the vertical component. Generating the outline of line segmentsincludes generating from the glyph an initial outline; scaling theinitial outline in accordance with the size to generate a scaledoutline; and changing any curve of the scaled outline to one or moreline segments. Determining an augmented scaled outline includes changingeach line segment in the translated and rejoined line segments that werepreviously converted from a curve back to the respective curve. Thedistance which a line segment is translated is based on a displacementnumber that is calculated as a function of scaled stem width or size.The function is for one of optical compensation, producing a boldappearance, or producing a light appearance. Calculation of theadjustment number includes calculating an initial displacement numberfor producing a bold appearance or for producing a light appearance;calculating an initial displacement number for optical compensation, thecalculating of the initial displacement number for optical compensationaccounting for the initial displacement number for producing a boldappearance or for producing a light appearance; and combining theinitial displacement number for producing a bold appearance or forproducing a light appearance with the initial displacement number foroptical compensation to obtain the displacement number. The methodfurther includes determining whether a rejoining of two line segmentshas violated one or more constraints, wherein the rejoining produces anintersection point that is the intersection of the two line segments,the intersection being an endpoint for each of the line segment; andwhen the rejoining is determined to have violated the one or moreconstraints, adjusting the position of the intersection point. The oneor more constrains require that an endpoint of a translated line segmentbe within a predetermined distance from the endpoint's pre-translatedposition. The one or more constraints are based on a miter limit. Themethod further includes generating a bitmap from the augmented scaledoutline. Determining of the augmented scaled outline of the glyph andgenerating the bitmap are performed by a rasterizer during rendering,the rasterizer being a component of a renderer. The method furthercomprises using a downsampler to downsample the bitmap, the downsamplerbeing a component of the renderer.

In general, in another aspect, the invention features a method andcomputer program product that implements the method, where the methodincludes receiving a glyph, the glyph having an outline that has anoutside path; identifying four extrema points of the outline, eachextrema point being an intersection of two vectors obtained from theoutline; for each of the extrema points, calculating a cross product ofthe two vectors intersecting at the extrema point, wherein a positiveresult of the cross product indicates that the outside path is wound ina first direction, and wherein a negative result of the cross productindicates that the outside path is wound in an opposite, seconddirection; and determining the winding order of the outside path basedon the cross products calculated.

Particular advantageous embodiments of the invention include one or moreof the following features. The first direction is counter clockwise andthe second direction is clockwise. Determining the winding order of theoutside path includes determining that the outside path is wound in thefirst direction when three or four of the results are positive,regardless of a default winding order for the font. Determining thewinding order of the outside path includes determining that the outsidepath is wound in the second direction when three or four of the resultsare negative, regardless of a default winding order for the font. Theglyph is associated with a font and a font type, and determining thewinding order of the outside path includes determining that the outsidepath is wound in a default winding direction unless the cross productsindicate otherwise, the default winding direction being obtained fromthe font and the font type. Determining the winding order of the outsidepath includes determining that the outside path is wound in a defaultwinding direction for the font when two of the results are positive andtwo of the results are negative. The method includes identifying, basedon the winding order of the outside path, an outward direction for aline segment tangent to the outside path. The method includes providingthe outward direction to a rasterizer of a rendering engine. The methodincludes providing the winding order to a rasterizer of a renderingengine.

In general, in another aspect, the features a system operable to performthe foregoing method.

The invention can be implemented to realize one or more of the followingadvantages. At small sizes, the appearance of a glyph or a stroke (e.g.,a line) can be adjusted to improve the contrast between the glyph orstroke and a background against which the glyph or stroke is displayed.With respect to glyphs, the adjustment can improve readability. A boldor light appearance of a glyph can be produced, even when there is nobold design or light design for the glyph. The bold or light glyphappearance so produced is referred to in the instant specification asynthetic bold or a synthetic light, respectively. The density value ofpixels representing the glyph or stroke can be adjusted even if anoriginal density value is a maximum or minimum density value and theadjustments will carry over into neighboring pixels. Pre-adjustment, aglyph or stroke can be rendered offset from a device resolution gridsuch that the adjusted representation of the glyph or stroke benefitsfrom adjustment without losing the benefits of hinting. Improvedconsistency can be achieved in the behavior among all glyphs of a fontand size, font family members (e.g., a regular font and a bold font),and text rendered at different sizes. Distinct phases for strokescomprising a glyph image can be preserved.

Adjustment can be effected during rendering when information such asfont/glyph properties, which may be lost post rendering and which canimprove readability of a glyph image, can be used. Effecting adjustmentduring rendering eliminates the need to retain such information postrendering.

Bitmap metrics can be changed during rendering to make allowance for anyimpending adjustments so that the bitmap can be generated and modifiedin place without the need to perform an additionalallocate/copy/deallocate step. The bitmap size, for example, can bechanged in place based on an amount of augmentation calculated in therendering process.

The assumed winding order of a glyph outline can be confirmed andcorrected without consuming large amounts of computing resources.Ensuring the winding order is correctly assumed can prevent incorrectrendering and/or adjustment results.

An improved smear bold technique can be provided. In a conventionalsmear bold technique, a copy of an original bitmap of a glyph isgenerated. In the copy, the glyph is usually offset, for example, in apositive x direction. The copy is combined with the original version ofthe bitmap to produce a bitmap in which the glyph appears to be smearedin the positive x direction. The resulting smear is thus not dithered.In contrast, the improved smear bold technique provides smears that aredithered. Moreover, the conventional smear bold techniques requires acopying of the bitmap. In contrast, the improved smear bold techniquecan be implemented in place, i.e., adjustment is effected withoutrequiring a copying of a bitmap. Furthermore, with improved smear bold,the glyph can be adjusted by a sub device pixel amount, as will bedescribed below.

The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth inthe accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features andadvantages of the invention will be apparent from the description, thedrawings, and the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a high resolution bitmap representation of a glyphrepresenting the character R.

FIG. 2 shows a gray scale representation of a glyph representing thecharacter R.

FIGS. 3A and 3B show glyph outlines representing the character R.

FIG. 4A shows an unadjusted gray scale representation of a glyphrepresenting the character R.

FIGS. 4B and 4C show adjusted versions of the gray scale representationof FIG. 4A.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a process for calculating final adjustmentvalues for pixel densities representing a glyph.

FIG. 6A shows an unadjusted high resolution bitmap representation of aglyph representing the character R.

FIG. 6B shows an unadjusted gray scale representation of the bitmapshown in FIG. 6A.

FIG. 6C shows a high resolution bitmap representation of a glyphrepresenting the character R and showing edge detection.

FIG. 6D shows an adjusted gray scale representation of the bitmap shownin FIG. 6C.

FIGS. 7A-C show graphical representations of initial adjustment values.

FIGS. 8A-G show look-up tables for initial adjustment values.

FIGS. 9A-G show high resolution bitmap and gray scale representations ofa glyph representing the character R.

FIG. 10 shows a process for adjusting the density values of devicepixels representing a glyph, while minimizing the stroke width in termsof device pixels.

FIGS. 11A-G show density maps and gray scale representations of a glyphrepresenting the character R.

FIG. 12 shows a table illustrating phase differences at correspondingscaled stem widths.

FIG. 13 is a flowchart showing a process for generating a bitmap for anaugmented glyph.

FIG. 14 is a flowchart showing an implementation for augmenting a glyph.

FIG. 15 is a flowchart showing a process for generating an outline foran augmented glyph.

FIG. 16 is a flowchart showing a process for determining winding order.

Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicatelike elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Glyph rendering at smaller sizes may be improved by adjusting thedensity values of device pixels used to represent the glyph on an outputdevice (e.g., a computer monitor). The term “density value” can refer toan alpha value in the range of 0 to 1 representing the percentage of adevice pixel that is a text color as compared to a background color,where 0 represents fully transparent (i.e., no text color) and 1represents fully opaque (i.e., all text color). Typically the densityvalue is adjusted to increase the density, and may be referred to as“darkening”. For example, in the case of a gray scale representation inshades of black against a white background, an increased pixel densityresults in the appearance of a darker pixel. Conventional darkeningtechniques cannot darken a pixel that already has a maximum densityvalue (e.g., a black pixel in a gray scale representation). For example,if a glyph is displayed in gray scale at a certain point size andincludes a stem that is an integral number of maximum intensity devicepixels wide (i.e., a black stem), then using conventional darkeningtechniques, the pixels forming the stem cannot be darkened (because theyare already of maximum density). This limitation makes the characterless readable.

The methods and systems described herein allow the appearance of strokesforming a glyph image to be adjusted whether or not an unadjusted strokeis formed of maximum density pixels. The appearance of a stroke isadjusted based on detection of the edges of the stroke, and anadjustment of a pixel's density value can carry over into a neighboringpixel if the pixel's unadjusted density value is at maximum.

In a hinting process, it may be important to be able to place a stroke(e.g., a vertical stem) in more than one position, the positionsdiffering from one another by less than one device pixel, to improveinterglyph spacing and reduce glyph distortion. The different positionscan be referred to as “phases”. The methods and systems described hereincan also preserve phase differences at various sizes. Adjustment of anappearance of a stroke need be calculated only once even when there aremultiple phases.

FIG. 4A shows an unadjusted gray scale representation 400 of a glyphcorresponding to the character “R”. The vertical stem 410 is acombination of a first column of maximum intensity (i.e., black) pixelsand a second column of less than maximum intensity (i.e., gray) pixels.FIG. 4B shows the gray scale representation of FIG. 4A adjustedaccording to conventional techniques to darken the intensity of the graypixels. The black pixels in the first column cannot be darkened as thedensity value is already the maximum permitted by the device. In FIG.4B, the stems and strokes appear darker, but the number of device pixelsmarked is not increased. By contrast, an adjusted gray scalerepresentation 420 is shown in FIG. 4C. This is the gray scalerepresentation of FIG. 4A with the density values adjusted based on edgedetection. In some instances the adjustment carries over into aneighboring pixel. For example, in FIG. 4C the vertical stem 425 isthree device pixels wide as compared to the vertical stems 410 and 417shown in FIGS. 4A and 4B, which are two device pixels wide. In FIG. 4C,the horizontal stems across the top 427 and middle 428 of the “R”increased from one pixel wide in FIGS. 4A and 4B to three pixels wide.

FIG. 5 shows a process 500 for adjusting the density values of devicepixels representing an image of a glyph based on edge detection, whichcan be used, for example, to adjust the gray scale representation 400shown in FIG. 4A to the adjusted gray scale representation 420 shown inFIG. 4C. In a first step, a glyph to be rendered at a given size (step505) belonging to a font is received by a renderer. For example, a glyphsuch as the glyph represented by the high resolution bitmap 605 shown inFIG. 6A may be received. The glyph corresponds to the character “R” inthe Adobe Type 1 font CronosMM at a point size of 26 pixels per em. Thebitmap 605 is shown on a fine grid having a ratio of 4×4 compared to thedevice resolution of an output device that will display the renderedglyph (i.e., 4 fine pixels in the x and y directions per one devicepixel). The coarse grid 620 represents the device resolution.

The left edge 610 of the vertical stem 615 is aligned to the coarse grid620, which suggests that the glyph outline used to generate the bitmap605 was hinted to align the edge 610 to the coarse grid 620 before scanconversion. The bitmap 605 can be downsampled to render a gray scalerepresentation 625 of the glyph, as shown in FIG. 6B.

Typically, a font defines a standard stem width that applies to allglyphs within the font. The standard stem width usually refers to avertical standard stem width, although a horizontal stem width may alsobe defined by the font. A standard stem width, or an approximatedstandard stem width, can be determined in a number of ways, depending onthe available information. In one implementation, the font dictionarycan be queried for the standard stem width. Alternatively, arepresentative glyph, for example, a lower case “l”, can be rasterizedand the stem width measured. As another alternative, a default value,e.g., 75/1000, can be used as an approximate standard stem width. Insome instances, a value of a standard stem width may be supplied by anelectronic document to be rendered, for example, a PDF font descriptor.

In this example, the Type 1 CronosMM font (step 510) is used. A scaledstem width is calculated by scaling the font's standard stem width tothe size at which the glyph is to be rendered (step 515). In thisexample, the font has a standard stem width of 46/1000 and the glyph isto be rendered at a size of 26 pixels per em. The scaled stem width canbe calculated by multiplying the standard stem width by the size, i.e.,46/1000*26=1.196, which may be rounded to the nearest ¼ pixel, andtherefore the scaled stem width for the glyph is 1.25 device pixels.

Based on the scaled stem width of the glyph, an initial adjustment valuefor the density values of the device pixels that will represent theglyph can be calculated (step 520). In one implementation, an initialadjustment value can be calculated by reference to a graph representinga function, such as the graph 700 shown in FIG. 7A depicting arelationship between a scaled stem width and an adjusted stem width. Thehorizontal axis of the graph represents a range of scaled stem widths,and the vertical axis represents a range of adjusted stem widths. Alinear relationship depicted by a line 705 is shown between the adjustedstem widths and the scaled stem widths when the density values of pixelsmaking up a stem have not been adjusted (i.e., scaled stemwidth=adjusted stem width). A non-linear relationship depicted by acurve is shown between the adjusted stem width and the scaled stem widthwhen the density values of pixels making up a stem have been adjusted,for example, to compensate for fading that can occur at smaller sizes.At a given scaled stem width, the difference 715 between the line 705and the curve 710 represents the initial adjustment value.

Scaled stem widths and adjusted stem widths are typically calculated interms of device pixel amounts, for example, using ¼ device pixelincrements if rendering a high resolution bitmap with a 4×4 grid ratio.FIG. 7B shows a graph that can be used to determine an initialadjustment value of a glyph in an Adobe Type 1 font to be displayed ingray scale in an Adobe Acrobat 5.0 application. The adjusted stem widthis shown in increments of a ¼ pixel, and the curve 710 of FIG. 7A istherefore replaced by a stepped line 725. The graph shown in FIG. 7C canbe used to determine an initial adjustment value of a glyph in an AdobeType 1 font to be displayed using subpixel rendering. Subpixel renderingrefers to a technique wherein the characteristics of a device are takeninto consideration in rendering a glyph, for example, taking intoconsideration the red, green and blue subpixels making up a device pixelin an RGB device. Cleartype rendering available from MicrosoftCorporation and Cooltype rendering available from Adobe are examples offonts that are used for subpixel rendering.

The relationship between a scaled stem width and an adjusted stem widthcan be implemented as a table, such as the tables illustrated in FIGS.8A-G. Such tables are useful when implementing the technique in acomputer program. FIG. 8A shows a table that can be used to determine aninitial adjustment value when a glyph to be rendered is in a Type 1 fontto be displayed in gray scale. As an example, consider a glyph having ascaled stem width of 12/16^(th) of a device pixel. Using the table 800,in particular row 807, an initial adjustment value is 4/16^(th) or 0.25of a pixel, per stroke edge. The same value can be found by reference tothe graph shown in FIG. 7B; at a scaled stem width of 12/16^(th) or0.75. The difference 730 between the line 720 and the stepped line 725is 0.50 of a pixel, which represents the adjustment per stroke. Theadjustment per stroke edge is therefore ½ of this amount, and is 0.25 ofa pixel.

In the present example, for illustrative purposes, the scaled stem widthand the initial adjustment value have been selected as 1.25 pixels and ¼pixel per stroke edge respectively. For the purpose of illustrating thetechniques for adjusting density values of device pixels describedherein, these exemplary values are easy to work with and provide clearillustrations of the benefits of the techniques of the invention. Theinitial adjustment value has not been selected according to one of thetables shown in FIGS. 8A-G, although in practice the value preferably ischosen according to the relevant table (i.e., based on the font andscaled stem width).

A glyph outline is rasterized to generate a bitmap 605 shown in FIG. 6A(step 522). In a next step, the edges of the strokes forming the glyphare detected (step 525). In one implementation, the formula shown inTable 1 below can be used for edge detection, where the variables “a”through “e” represent bits in a high resolution rasterizer output havingthe geometric relationship shown in the first column. The expression isTRUE if the central pixel, “c”, represents an edge.

TABLE 1 abcde (~c) & (a | b | d | e)

The calculation can be extended to parallel computation, using theformula shown in Table 2 below. The variables “a” through “e” representa row of 8 high resolution bits (i.e., a byte), again with the samegeometric relationship with the other bytes. The expression is an 8-bitbyte where a particular bit in the result is TRUE if and only if thebits corresponding pixel represents an edge. With respect to both Tables1 and 2, an edge is detected at a bit position if the bit is “off” andone or more of the four neighboring bits is “on”. Other techniques foredge detection can be used.

TABLE 2 abcde (~c) & (a | (b<<7) | (c>>1) | (c<<1) | (d>>7) | e)

Referring to FIG. 6C, the bitmap 605 of FIG. 6A is shown with the edgesdetected; the gray fine pixels outlining the original bitmap representthe initial adjustment value, and are referred to herein as the initialadjustment pixels 632. The initial adjustment pixels 632 are shown forillustrative purposes; the bitmap 605 has not actually been altered orre-generated to include the initial adjustment pixels 632. The initialadjustment pixels 632 are shown in FIG. 6C to assist in visualizing theadjustment technique, and are for illustrative purposes.

The density value of the device pixels that are marked by one or moreinitial adjustment pixels will be adjusted by a final adjustment value;the device pixels that are not marked (i.e., the “interior” or blackpixels) will not have their density values adjusted. However, theinterior pixels are already at maximum density. Although their densityvalue is not adjusted, the adjustment “carries over” into neighboringpixels. That is, although the density value of an interior pixel cannotbe increased, the amount by which an interior pixel would have beenincreased (if it were not already at maximum density), can be applied toa neighboring pixel, which may have an initial density value of zero.

Conventional darkening would not have darkened pixel 638 nor the otherpixels forming the left edge of the vertical stem (because they alreadyhave maximum density value). The left edge of the vertical stem wouldremain unchanged after darkening the glyph. The technique illustrated inFIG. 6C allows the darkening or adjustment of the maximum density pixelsforming the vertical stem to carry over into the neighboring pixels, forexample pixel 640 which is marked by four initial adjustment pixels 632.Pixel 640 initially was not marked by any fine grid pixels and was notincluded in the gray scale representation of the glyph (see FIG. 6B).However, pixel 640 will be included in the adjusted gray scalerepresentation downsampled from the bitmap 630.

To determine the final adjustment value for device pixels marked by theinitial adjustment pixels 632, the length of the edge of a strokepassing through the device pixels is calculated (step 530). In oneimplementation, the length is calculated in terms of the number ofinitial adjustment pixels 632 included in a device pixel divided by thegrid ratio. For example, the length of the edge 610 of the vertical stempassing through device pixel 640 is 4 initial adjustment pixels dividedby a grid ratio of 4, and is therefore 1. The length of the edge of thevertical and horizontal strokes passing through device pixel 645 is 6initial adjustment pixels divided by a grid ratio of 4, and is therefore1.5.

The final adjustment value for a device pixel is calculated from theinitial adjustment value and the length of the edge passing through thedevice pixel as follows (step 535):Final Adjustment Value=Initial Adjustment Value×Length of Edge

The initial adjustment value is expressed in terms of the adjustment ofa device pixel per stroke edge. The length of the edge of a strokepassing through a device pixel is represented as the number of initialadjustment pixels divided by the grid ratio. For example, the finaladjustment value of device pixel 640 can be calculated as follows. Theinitial adjustment value was previously determined above for the glyphat a point size of 26 pixels per em to be ¼ of a device pixel per edge.As shown in FIG. 6C, the length of the edge of the glyph passing throughdevice pixel 640 is 4/4=1. Applying the above formula, the finaladjustment value can be calculated as follows:(Final Adjustment Value)₆₄₀=¼×1=¼=0.25

As a second example, the final adjustment value of device pixel 645 canbe calculated as follows:(Final Adjustment Value)₆₄₅=¼×1.5=⅜=0.375

The final adjustment value for device pixel 645 is greater than thefinal adjustment value for device pixel 640, and accordingly the densityvalue of device pixel 645 will undergo a relatively larger adjustmentthan the density value of device pixel 640. If the output is a grayscale representation in shades of gray and black against a whitebackground, then device pixel 645 will appear to have been “darkened”more than device pixel 640.

The density value for each device resolution pixel is calculated (step540), taking into account a final adjustment value for the device pixelif applicable (i.e., if the device pixel includes one or more initialadjustment pixels). Density values can be expressed as a value rangingbetween 0 and 1. The adjusted density value can be calculated accordingto the formula below.Adjusted Density Value=Original Density Value+Final Adjustment Value

For example, the adjusted density value for device pixel 640 can becalculated as follows:(Adjusted Density Value)₆₄₀=0+0.25=0.25The level of gray applied to the device pixel 640 when rendering a grayscale representation of the pixel 640 shall correspond to a density of0.25. The adjusted density value for device pixel 645 can be calculatedas follows:(Adjusted Density Value)₆₄₅= 4/16+⅜=0.625An adjusted gray scale representation 650 of the glyph is shown in FIG.6D with the final adjustment values applied to adjust the density valuesof the edge pixels. A comparison of the adjusted gray scalerepresentation 650 to the original gray scale representation 625 shownin FIG. 6B illustrates the effect of adjusting the pixel density valuesof the edge pixels. This adjustment may include a carry over adjustmentinto neighboring pixels, such as along the left edge 610 of the verticalstem 615. For example, in the original bitmap 600, device pixel 640 wasnot marked by any fine grid pixels, and therefore had a density value of0. This is reflected in the original gray scale representation, i.e.,the device pixel 640 is white. By contrast, in the bitmap shown in FIG.6C, the device pixel 640 is marked with initial adjustment pixels, andthe density value is adjusted by the final adjustment value from 0 to0.25.

Similarly, device pixel 645 had an original density value of 4/16 or0.25, which is represented by a gray level shown in FIG. 6B. This graylevel is lighter (i.e., of a lower density level) than the gray levelshown in FIG. 6D, corresponding to the adjusted density value of 0.625.The overall appearance of the adjusted gray scale representation 650 isdarker than the overall appearance of the original gray scalerepresentation 625. The number of device pixels marked by the verticalstem increased from 2 pixels to 3 pixels, thereby widening the stem, interms of marked device pixels.

The technique for calculating final adjustment values and adjusting thedensity value of device pixels can be implemented in fonts such asAdobe's Type 1 font, Type 2 font, as well as TrueType fonts, and otherfonts. Implementations of the technique are not limited to renderingtext, i.e., glyphs, but can be implemented in any thin, filled shape.For example, in a graphics application drawing lines, such as a grid ina spreadsheet, the above technique can be implemented to adjust thedensity values of device pixels representing the lines forming the grid.

Minimizing the number of device pixels marked by a glyph's strokerepresented by adjusted density values may be desirable in someimplementations. For example, the adjusted gray scale representation ofthe glyph in FIG. 6D has a vertical stem that is marked by 3 devicepixels. This is one pixel wider than the original, unadjusted gray scalerepresentation 605 of the glyph in FIG. 6B, which has a vertical stemwidth of 2 pixels. The left edge 610 of the original gray scalerepresentation 625 is represented by a column of maximum density (i.e.,black) pixels, whereas the left edge of the adjusted gray scalerepresentation 650 is represented by a column of low density pixels.Such a column of low density pixels may give a blurred appearance to areader.

The blurring effect can occur when, pre-adjustment, the outline of theglyph is hinted to align one or more edges of the outline to the deviceresolution grid. For example, referring to FIG. 9A, a high resolutionbitmap representation 900 of a glyph corresponding to the character “R”is shown. The glyph is associated with the Adobe Type 1 CronosMM fontand is to be rendered at a 26 pixels per em size. The glyph outline 902that was rendered as the bitmap representation 900 is also depicted forillustrative purposes. The glyph outline 902 was hinted such that theleft edge 904 of the glyph outline 902 aligns to the device resolutiongrid 906. The glyph outline 902 is hinted according to, for example, theblack edge hinting policy described in pending U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 09/739,587, filed Dec. 15, 2000, by T. Dowling and R. D.Arnold, entitled “Hinted Stem Placement on High Resolution Pixel Grid”,the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.Referring to FIG. 9B, the original (i.e., unadjusted) gray scalerepresentation 908 of the glyph downsampled from the bitmap 900 isshown. The left edge of the vertical stem 910 is represented by maximumdensity (i.e., black) pixels.

FIG. 9C shows a high resolution bitmap 912 representation of the glyph,which for illustrative purposes includes edges that have been adjustedby an initial adjustment value of ¼ of a device pixel. The outline 902is shown overlying the bitmap 912 for illustrative purposes andcorresponds to the original hinted outline shown in FIG. 9A. FIG. 9Dshows an adjusted gray scale representation 916 downsampled from thebitmap 912. The vertical stem 918 in the adjusted gray scalerepresentation 916 is 3 device pixels wide, as compared to the verticalstem 910 in the original gray scale representation, which is 2 devicepixels wide. The horizontal stems 920 and 922 of the adjusted gray scalerepresentation 916 are also 3 device pixels wide, as compared to the 1pixel width of the corresponding horizontal stems 911 and 913 in theoriginal gray scale representation 908. The wider vertical andhorizontal stems in the adjusted gray scale representation 916 can havea blurring effect.

FIG. 10 shows a process 1000 to adjust the density values of devicepixels representing a glyph, while minimizing the stroke width in termsof device pixels to provide sharp edges for readability and maintainingcontrast. For illustrative purposes, the glyph represented in FIGS. 9Aand 9B will be adjusted according to the process 1000. In a first step,a glyph to be rendered at a certain size and belonging to a font isreceived (step 1005). In this example, the size is 26 pixels per em andthe font is Adobe Type 1 CronosMM. An initial adjustment value for theglyph is determined (step 1010) based on a scaled stem width of theglyph, using the techniques described above. In the present example, theinitial adjustment value is ¼ of a device pixel per glyph edge.

An offset amount is calculated, which will be an amount by which theglyph will be offset from the device resolution grid 906 when a bitmapis rasterized (step 1015), as compared to the position of the originalgrid outline 906. The bitmap representation of the glyph is rasterizedoffset from the device resolution grid 906 by the offset amount (step1020).

In one implementation, the offset amount is calculated as 1/n, where nis the grid ratio. That is, if the ratio of the high resolution grid tothe device resolution grid is 8×8, then an offset amount of ⅛ iscalculated. Preferably, the offset amount is greater than or equal tothe initial adjustment value. If a grid ratio of 8 gives an offsetamount that is less than an initial adjustment value, then the gridratio is adjusted, for example, to 4, thus giving a greater offset valueof ¼.

Referring to FIG. 9E, a high resolution bitmap representation 924 of theglyph is shown, offset from the device resolution grid 906 by ¼ devicepixel in the x and the y directions relative to the original position ofthe glyph outline 902 shown in FIG. 9A. By rendering the glyph offsetfrom the device resolution grid 906 by the offset amount, the densityvalues of the device pixels can be adjusted (i.e., the strokes“darkened”), while maintaining alignment of one or more of the glyph'sedges to the device resolution grid 906. In the present example, theinitial adjustment value is ¼ pixel. Therefore a device pixel can beadjusted by a density value of up to ¼ pixel, i.e., the final adjustmentvalue of a device pixel's density value can be ¼ pixel or less. Theoffset amount selected in the present example is ¼ of a device pixel,which is equal to the initial adjustment value.

Using techniques described above in reference to FIGS. 5 and 6A-D, thelength of an edge of the glyph passing through a device pixelrepresenting the glyph offset from the device resolution grid 906 by theoffset amount is calculated (step 1025). FIG. 9F shows a high resolutionbitmap representation 926 of the glyph that is offset from the deviceresolution grid 906 by the offset amount. For illustrative purposes, thebitmap representation of the glyph is shown adjusted along the edges ofthe glyph by the initial adjustment value (i.e., ¼ pixel). The fineresolution pixels shown in gray on the outside of the glyph outline 902are the initial adjustment pixels and represent the initial adjustmentvalue. As described above, the length of an edge of the glyph passingthrough a device pixel can be calculated by counting the number ofinitial adjustment pixels marking the device pixel and dividing by thegrid ratio. For example, device pixel 928 is marked by 6 initialadjustment pixels, and device pixel 930 is marked by 4 initialadjustment pixels.

A final adjustment value for the device pixels is calculated based onthe initial adjustment value and the lengths of the edge passing throughthe device pixels (step 1030). For example, the final adjustment valuesfor device pixels 928 and 930 can be calculated as follows:(Final Adjustment Value)₉₂₈=¼× 6/4= 6/16=0.375(Final Adjustment Value)₉₃₀=¼× 4/4=¼=0.25

The adjusted density values of the device pixels representing the glyphare calculated based on the original density values and the finaladjustment values (step 1035). For example, the adjusted density valuesfor the device pixels 928 and 930 can be calculated as follows:(Adjusted Density Value)₉₂₈= 9/16+0.375=0.9375(Adjusted Density Value)₉₃₀= 5/16+0.25=0.5625

The density values of the rendered glyph 926 are adjusted (step 1040).An adjusted gray scale representation 932 of the glyph shown in FIG. 9Gis generated from the adjusted density values and the bitmap 924 (FIG.9E). A comparison of the adjusted gray scale representation 932 to theoriginal gray scale representation 908 of FIG. 9B illustrates howadjusting the density values of the device pixels darkens the overallappearance of the glyph. The vertical stem width in both the adjustedgray scale representation 932 and the original gray scale representation908 is 2 device pixels wide. By comparison, the adjusted (but notoffset) gray scale representation 916 shown in FIG. 9D, which was notoffset from the device resolution grid 906 before rendering andadjusting, has a vertical stem width of 3 device pixels. The horizontalstems 911, 913 of the original gray scale representation 908, which wereone maximum density value pixel wide, are darkened in the adjusted grayscale representation 932 and are 2 pixels wide. This occurs without theblurred effect illustrated by the adjusted (but not offset) gray scalerepresentation 916 in FIG. 9D, i.e., contrast with the background ismaintained.

In the example shown in FIGS. 9E-G, the glyph was rendered offset byequal offset amounts in both the x and y directions. In anotherimplementation, the glyph can be rendered offset by an offset amount inonly one of the x and y directions, or offset by different offsetamounts in the x and y directions.

The technique for calculating an offset amount based on an initialadjustment value and rendering the glyph offset from the deviceresolution grid by the offset amount can be implemented in fonts such asTrueType, Adobe's Type 1 font, Type 2 font, and other fonts that allowsimilar types of hinting as the Type 1 font. Implementations of thetechnique are not limited to rendering text, i.e., glyphs, but can beimplemented in any thin, filled shape. For example, in a graphicsapplication drawing lines, such as a grid in a spreadsheet, the abovetechnique can be implemented to adjust the density values of devicepixels representing the lines forming the grid.

An implementation of the above described density value adjustment andglyph offsetting techniques is described in further detail in referenceto the table shown in FIGS. 8A-8G. FIG. 8A is an example of a table 800that can be used to determine an initial adjustment value when a glyphto be rendered is an Adobe Type 1 font to be displayed in gray scale.The first column 802 includes a set of scaled stem width valuesexpressed in terms of 1/16^(th) of a device pixel. Referring to thesixth row 803, the scaled stem width is 5 or 5/16^(th) of a devicepixel. The table includes scaled stem widths up to a maximum value of37, or 2 and 5/16^(th) of a device pixel. Typically, a table such asthis includes scaled stem width values up to a maximum of just over 2device pixels in width.

The second and third columns 804 and 806 are the X and Y grid ratiosrespectively. The values in these columns indicate, at a given scaledstem width, the grid ratio for a high resolution bitmap that will berendered to represent the glyph. In this particular table, at certainscaled stem widths the grid ratio is 4×4 (i.e., 4 fine grid pixels inthe x and y directions for each device pixel), whereas at other scaledstem widths the grid ratio is 8×8. The fourth column 808 indicates thehint grid ratio that is the ratio of the grid to which the glyph outlineis hinted to, relative to the device resolution grid. The sixth column809 indicates the hinting policy. The sixth and seventh columns 810 and812 indicate the alignment in the x and y directions. For example,referring to row 803, the x alignment value is 8 and the hint grid ratiois 8. That is, the glyph outline was hinted to a fine grid having a gridratio of 8×8 as compared to the device resolution grid. The position ofthe glyph outline was aligned to ⅛^(th) of a device pixel (i.e., alignedto the fine grid). If, for example, the x alignment value is 1, thatindicates the position of the glyph outline was aligned to the deviceresolution grid.

The next two columns 814 and 816 indicate the x and y offset amountsrespectively. For example, referring to row 803, at a scaled stem widthof 5/16^(th), the glyph is rendered offset from the hinted glyph outlineposition by 0 in the x direction and by 1 in the y direction. A highresolution bitmap representation of the glyph will not be offset in thex direction, but will be offset by an amount of ⅛^(th) of a device pixel(i.e., 1 fine grid pixel) in the y direction. At other scaled stemwidths, such as 11 through 25 sixteenths of a device pixel, the glyph isrendered offset by ⅛^(th) of a device pixel in both the x and the ydirections.

The next two columns 818 and 820 indicate whether the adjustment topixel density values will “carry” over to a neighboring pixel in the xand y directions respectively. A value of 0 indicates that there will beno carrying (i.e., 0=no), and a value of 1 indicates that there will becarrying (i.e., 1=yes). For example, referring to row 803, the x and yadjustment can carry in both the x and y directions, since the values incolumns 818 and 820 are both 1 (i.e., “yes”). If the value in eithercolumn is 0, meaning the adjustment value cannot carry into aneighboring pixel in the corresponding direction, then the edge detectorwill not identify such a neighboring pixel when detecting the edge.

The final column on the right, column 822, indicates the initialadjustment value corresponding to the scaled stem width indicated in thefirst column 802. For example, referring to row 803, at a scaled stemwidth of 5/16^(th), the initial adjustment value is 4/16.

Tables similar to FIG. 8A are shown in FIGS. 8C-G. FIG. 8C shows a tablefor determining initial adjustment values when using a Type 1 font willbe displayed using subpixel rendering. The grid ratio in this instanceis 6×6, which is typical when using subpixel rendering on a RGB outputdevice, as the fine grid resolution can be expressed as a multiple of 3.

FIGS. 8D and 8E show tables that can be used to determine initialadjustment values when using a TrueType font with isotropicanti-aliasing to be displayed in gray scale and subpixel renderingrespectively.

FIGS. 8F and 8G show tables for determining initial adjustment valuesfor TrueType fonts to be displayed in gray scale when hinting using ananisotropic anti-aliasing policy. Anisotropic anti-aliasing refers atechnique in which a bitmap representation of a glyph is generated byanti-aliasing to some degree in the x direction and to a differentdegree in the y direction. Anti-aliasing occurs in both directions, butnot to the same degree. Thus, an anti-aliasing process is used in the xdirection, and a different anti-aliasing process is used in the ydirection to generate a high resolution bitmap representation of theglyph. Anisotropic anti-aliasing is described further in U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 10/440,013, filed May 16, 2003, by T. Dowling andR. D. Arnold, entitled “Anisotropic Anti-Aliasing”, the entire contentsof which are hereby incorporated by reference.

FIGS. 11A-G illustrate an example of adjusting the density values of aglyph that is generating by anisotropic anti-aliasing is shown. FIG. 11Ashows a high resolution bitmap representation 1100 of a glyphrepresenting the character “R”, in a TrueType ArialMT font at a size of16 ppem. For illustrative purposes, the high resolution pixels in the ydirection are stretched vertically to fit the coarse grid correspondingto the device resolution. The grid ratio is 8×2, i.e., 8 fine gridpixels per device pixel in the x direction and 2 fine grid pixels perdevice pixel in the y direction. The scaled stem width is 1.4 pixels.Referring to FIG. 8C, an initial adjustment value can be determined forthe scaled stem width by rounding to 11/8ths (i.e., 1.375). Per row 840(i.e., the row corresponding to a scaled stem width of 11/8^(th)), theinitial adjustment value is 1/16^(th) of a device pixel. There is no“carry” in the y direction, per the Y Carry column 842, and accordinglythe edge detector does not detect horizontal edges aligned with devicepixel boundaries, however, horizontal edges that are not aligned withdevice pixel boundaries are detected. In some implementations, nothaving carry in the y direction can keep horizontal stems sharp,although at the expense of the stem not being darkened in the ydirection.

In one implementation, the edges can be detected using the formula shownin Table 3 below, where the edge detector can distinguish betweenhorizontal and vertical edges. The variables “a” through “e” representbits in a high resolution rasterizer output having the geometricrelationship shown in the first column. The expression is TRUE if thecentral pixel, “c”, represents a vertical and/or horizontal edge.

TABLE 3 bits vertical edges horizontal edges abcde (~c) & (b | d) (~c) &(a | e)

The thin gray line along the perimeter of the bitmap's 1100 edges inFIG. 11A represents the initial adjustment pixels 1105 in the xdirection. The horizontal edges that are across device pixel boundariesare not detected and marked by the thin gray line.

FIGS. 11B and C show the initial density values for device pixelsrepresenting the glyph before adjustment. The gray scale representation1115 in FIG. 11C is produced from the density map 1110 shown in FIG. Bby converting each density value to a gray value.

FIGS. 11D and E show the counts of vertical edges (FIG. 11D) andhorizontal edges (FIG. 11E) in each device pixel. It is possible toregister both a vertical and horizontal edge within the same devicepixel. These values are used to calculate a final adjustment value foreach device pixel. The final adjustment value for an anisotropicanti-aliased glyph can be calculated according to the following formula.Final Adjustment Value={(VEdge/YGrid)+(HEdge/XGrid)}×Initial AdjustmentValuewhere:

-   -   VEdge=length of vertical edge;    -   YGrid=grid ratio in y direction;    -   HEdge=length of horizontal edge; and    -   XGrid=grid ratio in x direction.

As an example, the final adjustment value for device pixel 1120 can becalculated as follows:(Final Adjustment Value)₁₁₂₀={( 2/2)+( 2/8)}× 1/16= 1.25/16= 1/16(truncated to nearest 16^(th))

FIGS. 11F and G show a density map and a gray scale representation ofthe glyph are shown, respectively, including adjusted pixel densityvalues. An adjusted density value for a device pixel is calculated byadding the final adjustment value of the device pixel to the initialdensity value of the device pixel. For example, the adjusted densityvalue for device pixel 1120 can be calculated as follows:(Adjusted Density Value)₁₁₂₀= 4/16+ 1/16= 5/16=0.3125The resulting gray scale representation 1125 is shown in FIG. 11G.

The examples of pixel density value adjustment described above use equaladjustment values for each edge of a stroke. A vertical stem, forexample, was adjusted using an initial adjustment value of ¼ pixelapplied to both the left and right edges of the stem. In oneimplementation, the density values of device pixels representing a glyphcan be adjusted asymmetrically, whereby a different initial adjustmentvalue can be applied to the two edges of a given stroke.

As show in FIG. 8B, five additional columns can be included in aninitial adjustment value table such as the table shown in FIG. 8A. LikeFIG. 8A, FIG. 8B also refers to an Adobe Type 1 font to be displayed ingray scale. The tables in FIGS. 8A and 8B can be implemented as a singletable. The five additional columns can include column 850 indicatingwhether to use asymmetric adjusting. Asymmetric adjusting means the twoedges of a glyph's stroke are not adjusted by equal amounts, as was thecase in the examples discussed above. Rather, one edge may be adjustedmore than the other, which may be useful for maintaining contrast alongone or more edges. For example, if an offset value is slightly greaterthan the amount by which a device pixel's intensity value is adjusted,then a device pixel that had a maximum intensity value pre-adjustment,may have an adjusted density value that is less than maximum, resultingin an edge that is no longer black. To maintain a black edge of a strokeformed by the device pixel, the device pixels along one edge may beadjusted more than on the other edge, such that device pixels along theedge (post-adjustment) are of maximum density value.

Referring again to FIG. 8B, column 852 indicates a low initial densityvalue, column 854 indicates a low initial adjustment value, column 856indicates a high initial density value and column 858 indicates a highinitial adjustment value. If column 850 indicates that there is noasymmetric darkening (i.e., has a value of 0), then the values in theremaining four columns 852, 854, 856 and 858 are all 0, for example,rows 1-5. With respect to FIGS. 8C-G, these columns are not shownbecause there was no asymmetric adjusting, and the values in these fivecolumns would have been all zeros.

In the implementation shown in FIGS. 8A and 8B, initial adjustmentvalues can be selected as follows. As an example, consider a glyph to berendered having a scaled stem width of 5/16ths, therefore correspondingto the row 803 in FIG. 8A and row 860 in FIG. 8B. If, upon edgedetection, an initial density value of device pixels along an edge of astroke is 0 (column 852), i.e., the edge was along a device pixelboundary, then the initial adjustment value used for the device pixelsalong the edge is 2/16ths (column 854). If, upon edge detection, aninitial density value of device pixels along an edge of a stroke is 24(column 856), then the initial adjustment value used for the devicepixels along the edge is 6/16ths (column 858). If, upon edge detection,an initial density value of device pixels along an edge of a stroke isneither the low initial density value in column 852 nor the high initialdensity value in column 856, then the initial adjustment value in column822 of FIG. 8A is used.

Asymmetric adjusting can also be useful to preserve phase differences.Referring to FIG. 12, a table is shown that illustrates in the far rightcolumn 1205 two phases of a stem width having a scaled stem width equalto the value in the far left column 1210. The rasterized stem width(i.e., pre-adjustment) is shown as a bold line, and the “darkeningamount” or the initial adjustment value is shown as a light line. The“phase difference” column 1215 indicates the difference in position ofthe stem at the two different phases.

In another implementation, a “horizontal initial adjustment value” canbe calculated with respect to horizontal strokes and a “vertical initialadjustment value” can be calculated with respect to vertical strokes. Ahorizontal standard stem width can be determined using the techniquesdescribed above in the context of a vertical standard stem width, and ahorizontal scaled stem width can then be determined from the horizontalstandard stem width and a size at which a glyph is to be rendered. Thehorizontal initial adjustment value can then be determined based on thehorizontal scaled stem width, for example, using the techniquesdescribed above, referring to tables similar to those shown in FIGS.8A-G (which are for vertical scaled stem widths). The vertical initialadjustment value can be calculated as described above in reference tothe horizontal initial adjustment value.

The horizontal initial adjustment value can be used to adjust horizontalstrokes, and is therefore used to determine a final adjustment value fordevice pixels that will be adjusted in the y direction. The finaladjustment value can be calculated based on the horizontal initialadjustment value and the length of a horizontal edge of a glyph passingthrough a device pixel. The vertical initial adjustment value can beused to adjust vertical strokes, and is therefore used to determine afinal adjustment value for device pixels that will be adjusted in the xdirection. A final adjustment value for a glyph can be calculated usingthe following formula:Final Adjustment Value=(VEdge/YGrid)×VInit}+{(HEdge/XGrid)×HInit}

where:

-   -   VEdge=length of vertical edge    -   YGrid=grid ratio in the y direction    -   VInit=vertical initial adjustment value    -   HEdge=length of horizontal edge    -   XGrid=grid ratio in the x direction    -   HInit=horizontal initial adjustment value

The glyph may be rendered offset from the device resolution grid, andmay be offset equal or different amounts in the x and y directions, asdescribed above.

Referring again to the tables in FIGS. 8A-G, a number of parameters forrendering a glyph can be decided based on a scaled stem width of theglyph. For example, consider row 804 in FIG. 8A and the correspondingrow 805 in FIG. 8B. A renderer that is to render a glyph in a Type 1font in gray scale having a scaled stem width of 12/16ths, can determinefrom FIGS. 8A and 8B the following rendering parameters:

-   -   x and y grid ratios    -   hint grid ratio    -   hinting policy    -   x and y alignment    -   x and y offset amounts    -   whether to carry adjustment in the x and y directions    -   an initial adjustment value    -   whether to asymmetric adjust    -   a “low” initial adjustment value for a low density value if        asymmetrically adjusting    -   a “high” initial adjustment value for a high density value if        asymmetrically adjusting

The above parameters can be collectively referred to as an example of a“rendering policy”. Other rendering policies can include more, fewerand/or different parameters than those included in FIGS. 8A and 8B. Therendering policy is selected by the renderer based on the scaled stemwidth of a glyph to be rendered, and can be selected dynamically andpre-rasterization, e.g., before generation of a bitmap representation ofthe glyph.

FIG. 13 shows a process 1300 performed by the renderer for adjusting thedensity values of device pixels representing an image of a glyph. Theprocess 1300 is an alternative to the process 500 described in referenceto FIG. 5, which implements glyph adjustment based on an edge detectiontechnique. The process 1300 implements a smear bold technique that is animprovement over conventional smear bold techniques. That is, the bitmapadjustment effected by the process 1300 is a form of smear bold.

A glyph that is associated with a font and that is to be rendered at aparticular size on a raster of a raster output device is received orobtained by the renderer along with a grid ratio (step 1305). The glyphshown in FIG. 6A is an example of a glyph that can be received. Theglyph's font belongs to a particular font type. The grid ratio specifiesan integral number of rows of fine pixels and an integral number ofcolumns of fine pixels that correspond to height and width,respectively, of a device pixel of the raster of the raster outputdevice. The grid ratio thus specifies the number of fine pixels thatcorrespond to a device pixel.

The stem width of the font type is determined (step 1310), and a scaledstem width is calculated (step 1315). Steps 1310 and 1315 are performedas described in reference to steps 510 and 515 of FIG. 5. Either or bothof the horizontal and vertical scaled stem widths can be calculated. Ascaled horizontal stem width is used for producing vertical smears. Ascaled vertical stem width is used for producing horizontal smears.

When the renderer is requested to provide a synthetic bold or syntheticlight rendering of the glyph, a bold-light adjustment number isdetermined (step 1320). The bold-light adjustment number is used inproducing either synthetic bold by marking fine pixels that are unmarkedor in producing synthetic light by unmarking fine pixels that are marked(i.e., erasing fine pixels). The bold-light adjustment number isconveniently expressed in units of fine pixels. The determination isbased on the scaled stem width calculated in step 1320. Alternatively,the determination can be based on the particular size at which the glyphis to be displayed, for example, a particular number of points per em orpixels per em. The determination can be effected by use of a functionfor producing synthetic bold, for example, one that describes a linearrelationship between the scaled stem width and the bold-light adjustmentnumber of fine pixels to be marked or unmarked.

When the renderer is requested to provide optical compensation inrendering the glyph, an optical compensation adjustment number isdetermined (step 1325). The optical compensation adjustment number isused for optical compensation, which is effected by marking fine pixels.(Optical compensation characteristically does not erase fine pixels.)The optical compensation number is conveniently expressed in units offine pixels. The determination is based on the scaled stem widthcalculated in step 1320. Alternatively, the determination can be basedon the particular size at which the glyph is to be displayed. Thedetermination can be effected by use of a function for opticalcompensation, for example, a function that describes an inverselyproportional relationship between the scaled stem width and the opticalcompensation adjustment number of fine pixels to be marked. Oneimplementation of such a function is:Number of fine pixels=1.25*(12−scaled stem width)

Except for the use of a different function, i.e., one for opticalcompensation as opposed to one for producing synthetic bold or light,the determination of the number of fine pixels to be marked for opticalcompensation is similar to the determination of the number of pixels tobe marked for producing synthetic bold or light.

The above-mentioned requests for synthetic bold, synthetic light, andoptical compensation can be initiated by a human operator. The operatorcan effect the request, for example, by checking an appropriate box in agraphical user interface to indicate that synthetic bold, syntheticlight, or optical compensation is desired. Alternatively, the requestcan be initiated by a program such as an application that is outputtinga character represented by the glyph.

There can be two different adjustment numbers determined for each ofsteps 1320 and 1325, one calculated from a scaled vertical stem widthand the other calculated from a scaled horizontal stem width. The onecalculated from a scaled horizontal stem width is used for applying theimproved smear bold technique in a vertical direction, and the onecalculated from a scaled vertical stem width is used for applying theimproved smear bold technique in a horizontal direction.

The bold-light adjustment number and the optical compensation adjustmentnumber are combined (step 1330). In one implementation they are simplyadded. In this implementation, the optical compensation number ispositive. The bold-light adjustment number is positive if synthetic boldis requested and negative if synthetic light is requested. A positiveresult of the add operation indicates that fine pixels are to be markedto effect the adjustment. A negative result indicates that fine pixelsare to be erased to effect the adjustment. The resulting combination isreferred to in the instant specification as an adjustment number. Theadjustment number can be constrained to be within a maximum limit and aminimum limit.

The glyph is rendered at the particular size to generate a bitmap (step1335). The bitmap represents fine pixels of a high resolution rastermarked to represent the glyph. Optionally, the bitmap can includepadding, i.e., unmarked fine pixels added to one or more edges of thebitmap to allow for augmentation of fine pixels, as will be describedbelow. The amount of padding can be calculated from the above-describedadjustment numbers. By way of example, the amount of padding can be acombination of the adjustment numbers.

The bitmap is adjusted (step 1340). In general, adjustment is effectedby marking or erasing one or more pixels at a transition of a markedpixel to an unmarked pixel in a particular direction. The number ofpixels marked or erased is determined based on the adjustment numbergenerated in the previous step. FIG. 14 illustrates an implementation ofadjustment.

Optionally, bitmap metrics are changed (step 1345). Bitmap metricsinclude, for example, bitmap height, width, origin and advance. A metriccan be changed to account for any adjustment. For example, the origin ofthe bitmap can be moved left to compensate for an adjustment that grew aglyph's right edges and that consequently moved the glyph's advance tothe right.

A density value for each device pixel is calculated (step 1350). Thisstep is performed as described in reference to step 540 of FIG. 5.

FIG. 14 illustrates a process 1400 performed by a renderer for adjustinga bitmap according to an adjustment number. The adjustment number can becalculated as described in reference to step 1330. The renderer receivesor obtains the adjustment number (step 1405). The adjustment number isdivided by the number of rows of fine pixels that correspond to theheight of a device pixel (step 1410). For example, if the grid ratio is6×5 (i.e., 6 fine pixels in the x direction and 5 fine pixels in the ydirection for each device pixel), and there thus are five rows of finepixels corresponding to the height of the device pixel, the combinationwould be divided by 5. The result may or may not be an integer. Dividingan adjustment number having a value of 8 by 5, for example, would yield1.6.

If the result is an integer (YES branch from decision 1415), then theinteger is stored for later use (step 1420). If the result of step 1410is not an integer (NO branch from decision 1415), then the two integerclosest to the result are selected (step 1425). If the result is 1.6,for example, 1 and 2 would be selected and stored for later use.

A pattern of instances of the two integers is defined (step 1430).Advantageously, the pattern is defined so that the number of pixels tobe marked or erased will be distributed as evenly as possible along anedge of the glyph. An even distribution tends to maintain fidelity tothe glyph's original shape. The pattern can be any form of dithering inwhich the amount of adjustment (augmentation or erosion) from one row ofpixels to the next does not vary by more than one fine pixel. That is,the minimum and maximum adjustment amounts are within one fine pixelover all of the rows of the bitmap.

The number of instances in the pattern depends on the grid ratio. Inparticular, the number of instances is the number of rows of fine pixelthat correspond to the height of a device pixel. For a grid ratio of6×5, the number of instances is 5. The sum of values of the instances isequal to the adjustment number received in step 1405. For theabove-described example in which the adjustment number has a value of 8and the grid ratio is 6×5, a pattern of 2, 2, 2, 1, and 1 can bedefined.

An unprocessed row of fine pixels in the high resolution bitmap isselected (step 1435). An unprocessed row is a row for which adjustmenthas not been effected. The rows are selected in order from top tobottom. Alternatively, the rows can be selected in other orders, forexample, in order from bottom to top or from middle to top and thenbottom to middle.

For a currently selected row, a per-transition adjustment number isdetermined (step 1440). The determination depends on whether the resultof step 1410 is an integer. If it is, then there is only one integer tobe considered and the integer is the per-transition number for the row.If the result of step 1410 is not an integer, however, then there aretwo integers to be considered and one of these number is selected basedon the pattern of numbers defined in step 1430. In general, the patterndetermines the sequence of integers to use for an order in which rowsare selected. The sequence is repeated until there are no more rows toprocess. For the above-described pattern of 2, 2, 2, 1 and 1, thenumbers selected for the top, second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixthrows of the bitmap are 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, and 2, respectively.

The per-transition number is line specific. That is, it is determinedline by line. For the implementation being described, in which smearingis in a horizontal direction, the per-transition number is determinedrow by row. For an implementation in which smearing is in a horizontaldirection, the per-transition number would be determined column bycolumn.

For the currently selected row, the renderer locates each transitionfrom a marked fine pixels to an unmarked fine pixel in a particulardirection. For each transition located, the renderer marks a group ofone or more unmarked pixels adjacent to the transition, if syntheticbold, optical compensation, or both are requested, or erase a group ofone or more marked pixels adjacent to the transition, if synthetic lightis requested or if synthetic light and optical compensation arerequested and the adjustment for synthetic light trumps the adjustmentfor optical compensation, i.e., the bold-light adjustment number isgreater than the optical compensation adjustment number (step 1445). Theparticular direction is left to right. Alternatively, the particulardirection is right to left. The selected row can include zero or moretransitions. If no transitions are located, then no adjustment is madefor the row, and the per-transition number determined for current row isnot carried forward to the next row. That is, another determination ofthe per-transition adjustment is made for the next row.

Whether there are unprocessed rows remaining is determined (decisionstep 1450). If there are, then steps 1435 through step 1445 arerepeated. Otherwise, the process is completed and bitmap metrics can bechanged as described above in reference to step 1345.

In the above-described process 1400, the direction of the smear ishorizontal, so the described processing is performed on a row by rowbasis and the adjustment number is divided by the y component of thegrid ratio. For smearing in a vertical direction, the describedprocessing is performed on a column by column basis and the adjustmentnumber is divided by the x component of the grid ratio.

FIG. 15 illustrates a process 1500 performed by the renderer foradjusting the density values of device pixels representing an image of aglyph. The process 1500 is an alternative to the processes 500 and 1300described in reference to FIG. 5 and FIG. 13, respectively. The process1500 implements an outline adjustment technique, as will be describedbelow.

A glyph that is associated with a font and that is to be rendered at agiven size on a raster of a raster output device is received along witha grid ratio by the renderer (step 1505). The stem width of the fonttype is determined (step 1510). A scaled stem width is calculated (step1515). Steps 1510 and 1515 are performed as described in reference tosteps 510 and 515 of FIG. 5. Either or both of the horizontal andvertical scaled stem widths can be calculated, as discussed above.

When synthetic bold or synthetic light is requested, a bold-lightdisplacement number is determined (step 1520). The bold-lightdisplacement number is used for producing synthetic bold or forproducing synthetic light. The bold-light displacement number isexpressed in units of fine pixels. The determination is based on thescaled stem width calculated in step 1520. Alternatively, thedetermination can be based on the particular size at which the glyph isto be displayed. The determination can be effected by use of a functionfor producing synthetic bold, for example, a function that describes alinear relationship between the scaled stem width and the bold-lightadjustment number.

When optical compensation is requested, an optical compensationdisplacement number is determined (step 1525). The optical compensationdisplacement number is used for optical compensation and is usuallyexpressed in units of fine pixels. The determination is based on thescaled stem width calculated in step 1520. The determination can beeffect by use of a function for optical compensation, for example, onethat describes an inversely proportional relationship between the scaledstem width and the optical adjustment number.

Optionally, there can be four bold-light displacement numbers determinedfor step 1520, one for displacement in the positive x direction, one fordisplacement in the negative x direction, one for displacement in thepositive y direction, and one for displacement in the negative ydirection. The ones for displacement is a horizontal direction can becalculated from a scaled vertical stem width, and the ones for verticaldisplacement can be calculated from a scaled horizontal stem width. Thenumbers can be different from each other when asymmetric adjustment isdesired. For example, the number for displacement in the positive xdirection can be difference from the number for displacement in thenegative x direction.

Likewise, there can be four optical compensation displacement numbersdetermined in step 1525, which can also have different values.

The bold-light displacement number or numbers and the opticalcompensation displacement number or numbers are combined (step 1530).The resulting combination is referred to in the instant specification asthe displacement number.

When there are four bold-light displacement numbers and four opticalcompensation displacement numbers, they are combined by theirdisplacement direction. That is, the bold-light number for positive xdisplacement is combined with the optical compensation number forpositive x displacement, the bold-light number for negative xdisplacement is combined with the optical compensation number fornegative x displacement, the bold-light number for positive ydisplacement is combined with the optical compensation number forpositive y displacement, and the bold-light number for negative ydisplacement is combined with the optical compensation number fornegative y displacement. There can thus be four displacement numbers.

The renderer generates a scaled outline of the glyph (step 1535). Ascaled outline is an outline that has been scaled to the size at whichthe glyph is to be rendered. The outline can include zero or morecurves. Curves defining glyphs are generally Bezier curves. The outline,for example, can be defined by line segments and no curves.Alternatively, the outline can be defined solely by Bezier curves.

When the outline includes curves, each curve is changed to one or moreline segments (step 1540). The change is performed using the controlpoints of defining the curves. These points define the line segmentscorresponding to the curve. For a third order Bezier curve, the controlpoints would be the two end points of the curve and two additionalcontrol points.

The line segments of the outline are translated (step 1545). The linesegments are moved in an outward direction for optical compensation andto produce synthetic bold and in an inward direction to produce asynthetic light. The outward direction and the inward direction can beperpendicular to the line segment. The outward direction points to anexterior of the glyph outline. The inward direction points in theopposite direction to an interior of the glyph outline. The windingorder of the outline can be used to identify the exterior of theoutline. Winding order can be determined as described below in referenceto FIG. 16.

When there is only one displacement number, the line segments are movedby a distance that is equal to the displacement number.

When there are four displacement numbers, the distance which the linesegments is determined by selection of displacement numbers.Displacement numbers are selected based on a classification of theinward direction or outward direction which the line segment is to bemoved. Inward or outward directions can be classified as up, down, left,right, between up and left, between down and left, between down andright, and between up and right. Displacement numbers are selected sothat the line segment is moved in the appropriate direction. Forexample, if the outward direction which a line segment is to be moved isup, then the displacement number for displacement in the positive xdirection is selected. If the outwards direction is between up andright, then the displacement number for displacement in the positive xdirection and the displacement number for displacement in the positive ydirection are selected.

The moving of line segments usually disconnects their endpoints fromeach other.

After they are moved, formerly connected line segments are rejoined(step 1550). This joining is performed by extending or trimming thesegments' endpoints until each pair of adjacent line segments joins atan intersection point that becomes an endpoint of each the line segmentsof the pair.

Optionally, the joining is subject to one or more constraints and anintersection is adjusted when the one or more constraints are violated(step 1555). One constraint limits the distance at which an endpoint ofa line segment can be moved. The distance can be represented by avertical component and a horizontal component of the distance, each ofwhich can be expressed in terms of a number of fine pixels. Theconstraints can, alternatively, be based on a miter limit, which isdescribed in Adobe's PostScript Language Reference Manual (3^(rd) ed).

Any line segment changed from a curve in step 1540 is changed back to acorresponding curve (step 1560). In this way, an augmented scaledoutline of the received glyph is determined from the moved and joinedline segments.

A bitmap is generated from the augmented scaled outline (step 1565), asdescribed above in reference to step 1335. Optionally, bitmap metricsare changed (step 1570), as described above in reference to step 1345.The density value for each device pixel is calculated (step 1575). Thisstep is performed as described in reference to step 540 of FIG. 5.

In the above-described processes 1300 and 1500, steps 1305 through 1345and steps 1505 through 1570 can be performed by a rasterizer. Steps 1350and 1575 can be performed by a downsampler. The rasterizer is acomponent of a renderer that generally functions to provide a highresolution bitmap of a glyph. In the course of generating a bitmap for aglyph, the rasterizer usually has sufficient information to generate anoutline of the glyph, which can be adjusted as described in FIG. 15 andoutput to a process requesting the outline and which can be requested byanother process. The downsampler is a component of the renderer thatgenerally functions to downsample a high resolution bitmap to generate agray scale representation of a glyph image.

FIG. 16 shows a process 1600 for determining winding order of a glyphoutline. The winding order specifies a direction of travel along pathsof an outline. An outline can include an outside path and an insidepath. An outline of a glyph that represents the letter “O”, for example,includes an outside path and an inside path. The outside and insidepaths are usually, and assumed to be, wound in opposite directions.

A glyph outline is received along with a font type (step 1605). Theoutline includes only line segments, some of which may have been Beziercurves that were converted to line segments as described above. Theoutline includes one or more outside paths. A font type typicallyspecifies a default winding order.

Four extrema points are obtained (step 1610). In the course of pathanalysis that finds bounding box information (extrema points), vectorsthat attach to the extrema points are stored. In general, extrema pointsare identified by determining a maximum x value of an endpoint of a linesegment on the outline, a minimum x value of an endpoint of a linesegment on the outline, a maximum y value of an endpoint of a linesegment on the outline, and a minimum y value of an endpoint of a linesegment on the outline. Any standard function for locating minima andmaxima is suitable for identifying extrema points.

The extrema points are by definition located on an outside path. Theextrema may be obtained from different outside paths when the outlinehas multiple outside paths.

For each extrema point, two vectors that intersect at the extrema areobtained from the outline and their cross product is calculated (step1615). A right hand coordinate system is used and a right hand rule isused to define orientation in the cross vector space. The vectors arethose that intersect at the extrema point. The cross product result is avector that is orthogonal to the outline, either in the positive ornegative z direction. A positive result indicates a counterclockwisewinding order and a negative result indicates a clockwise winding order.

The winding order is determined based on the default winding order andthe results of the cross products (step 1620). The default winding orderis used unless three or four of the results indicate otherwise.

In the above description, implementations have been described in which ahigh resolution bitmap was generated, for example, at step 522 and step1020 of FIGS. 5 and 10, respectively. A bitmap represents a grid ofcells, which can be, for example, squares, rectangles, triangles, ortrapezoids. Other techniques can be used, other than generating abitmap, for example, a precursor structure referred to as a “crossarray” may be generated, which includes high resolution informationabout where lines intersect projected pixel centers. Adjusted alpha mapsmay be generated from the information included in the cross arraystructure.

Moreover, implementations have been described in which processing isperformed on a row by row basis. Processing is not so limited, however,and can be performed on a column by column basis.

In the described implementations, the outlines being processed includedBezier curves, examples of which include cubic Bezier curves andquadratic Bezier curves. The invention is not limited to processingoutlines having Bezier curves, but rather can be applied to outlinesthat include other types of curves, as long as the curve is defined byinformation that can be used to calculate points associated with thecurve. An example of such a non-Bezier curve is an arc defined byPostScript. In PostScript, an arc is generally defined by an origin,radius, starting angle, and ending angle. This information can be usedto calculate endpoints of the arc, which can be processed as theabove-described control points are processed to obtain line segments.

The above description made reference to examples using fonts includingRoman characters, in particular, the character R. However, it should beunderstood that the techniques described in this specification can beused with fonts including other types of characters including, forexample, Japanese kanji characters, Cyrillic characters or Arabiccharacters. Further, the techniques can be used in alternative writingmodes such as left to right, right to left or vertical.

Embodiments of the invention and all of the functional operationsdescribed in this specification can be implemented in digital electroniccircuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including thestructures disclosed in this specification and their structuralequivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them. Embodiments ofthe invention can be implemented as one or more computer programproducts, i.e., one or more modules of computer program instructionsencoded on a computer readable medium, e.g., a machine-readable storagedevice, a machine-readable storage medium, or a memory device, forexecution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus.The term “data processing apparatus” encompasses all apparatus, devices,and machines for processing data, including by way of example aprogrammable processor, a computer, or multiple processors or computers.The apparatus can include, in addition to hardware, code that creates anexecution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., codethat constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a databasemanagement system, an operating system, or a combination of them. Apropagated signal is an artificially generated signal, e.g., amachine-generated electrical, optical, or electromagnetic signal, thatis generated to encode information for transmission to suitable receiverapparatus.

A computer program (also known as a program, software, softwareapplication, script, or code) can be written in any form of programminglanguage, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can bedeployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module,component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computingenvironment. A computer program does not necessarily correspond to afile in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a filethat holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in amarkup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program inquestion, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store oneor more modules, sub-programs, or portions of code). A computer programcan be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computersthat are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites andinterconnected by a communication network.

The processes and logic flows described in this specification can beperformed by one or more programmable processors executing one or morecomputer programs to perform functions by operating on input data andgenerating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performedby, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logiccircuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC(application-specific integrated circuit).

Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, byway of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, andany one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, aprocessor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory ora random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer area processor for executing instructions and one or more memory devicesfor storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will alsoinclude, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer datato, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g.,magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computerneed not have such devices. Moreover, a computer can be embedded inanother device, e.g., a mobile telephone, a personal digital assistant(PDA), a mobile audio player, a Global Positioning System (GPS)receiver, to name just a few. Information carriers suitable forembodying computer program instructions and data include all forms ofnon-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memorydevices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks,e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto-optical disks; andCD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks. The processor and the memory can besupplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.

To provide for interaction with a user, embodiments of the invention canbe implemented on a computer having a display device, e.g., a CRT(cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor, fordisplaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device,e.g., a mouse or a trackball, by which the user can provide input to thecomputer. Other kinds of devices can be used to provide for interactionwith a user as well; for example, feedback provided to the user can beany form of sensory feedback, e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback,or tactile feedback; and input from the user can be received in anyform, including acoustic, speech, or tactile input.

Particular embodiments of the invention have been described. Otherembodiments are within the scope of the following claims. For example,the actions recited in the claims can be performed in a different orderand still achieve desirable results.

1. A computer-implemented method comprising: receiving a glyph to berendered at a size; generating from the glyph an outline of linesegments, each line segment having two endpoints and a plurality ofpoints; for each of the line segments, performing, in a computer,operations comprising: determining a movement direction for the linesegments, where the movement direction is based on an exterior of theoutline of line segments, where the exterior of the outline of linesegments is determined based on a winding order, where the winding orderis determined based on cross products of a plurality of vector pairs,and where each vector pair is two vectors that intersect at an extremapoint of the outline of line segments; and translating the line segmentin the movement direction by a distance, where translating comprisesmoving each point of the line segment in a same direction by a samedistance; after translating the line segments, rejoining pairs ofadjacent line segments, where rejoining a pair of adjacent line segmentscomprises: if the adjacent line segments do not intersect, extending theendpoints of one or both of the line segments until the line segmentsjoin at an intersection point that is an endpoint of each of the linesegments of the pair; and if the adjacent line segments do intersect,trimming the endpoints of one or both of the line segments until theline segments join at an intersection point that is an endpoint of eachof the line segments of the pair; determining a synthetic bold orsynthetic light scaled outline of the glyph from the translated andrejoined line segments.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein: the movementdirection is perpendicular to the line segment.
 3. The method of claim1, wherein: the movement direction is classified as one of apredetermined set of cardinal directions, and the distance which theline segment is translated is based on a classification of the directionin which the line segment is translated.
 4. The method of claim 3,wherein: the cardinal directions are up, down, left, right, between upand right, between up and left, between down and left, and between downand right.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein: the distance which a linesegment is translated is represented by a horizontal component and avertical component, and the line segment is translated by moving eachendpoint of the line segment by the horizontal component and by thevertical component.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein generating theoutline of line segments includes: generating from the glyph an initialoutline; scaling the initial outline in accordance with the size togenerate a scaled outline; and changing any curve of the scaled outlineto one or more line segments.
 7. The method of claim 6, whereindetermining the synthetic bold or synthetic light scaled outlineincludes: changing each line segment in the translated and rejoined linesegments that were previously converted from a curve back to therespective curve.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein: the distance whicha line segment is translated is based on a displacement number that iscalculated as a function of scaled stem width or size.
 9. The method ofclaim 8, wherein: the function is for one of optical compensation,producing a bold appearance, or producing a light appearance.
 10. Themethod of claim 8, wherein calculation of the displacement numberincludes: calculating an initial displacement number for producing abold appearance or for producing a light appearance; calculating aninitial displacement number for optical compensation, the calculating ofthe initial displacement number for optical compensation accounting forthe initial displacement number for producing a bold appearance or forproducing a light appearance; and combining the initial displacementnumber for producing a bold appearance or for producing a lightappearance with the initial displacement number for optical compensationto obtain the displacement number.
 11. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising: determining whether a rejoining of two line segments hasviolated one or more constraints, wherein the rejoining produces anintersection point that is the intersection of the two line segments,the intersection being an endpoint for each of the line segments; andwhen the rejoining is determined to have violated the one or moreconstraints, adjusting the position of the intersection point.
 12. Themethod of claim 11, wherein: the one or more constraints require that anendpoint of a translated line segment be within a predetermined distancefrom the endpoint's pre-translated position.
 13. The method of claim 11,wherein: the one or more constraints are based on a miter limit.
 14. Themethod of claim 1, further comprising: generating a bitmap from thesynthetic bold or synthetic light scaled outline.
 15. The method ofclaim 14, wherein: determining the synthetic bold or synthetic lightscaled outline of the glyph and generating the bitmap are performed by arasterizer during rendering, the rasterizer being a component of arenderer.
 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising: using adownsampler to downsample the bitmap, the downsampler being a componentof the renderer.
 17. A computer-readable medium encoded with a computerprogram, the program comprising instructions operable to cause acomputing device to perform a method comprising: receiving a glyph to berendered at a size; generating from the glyph an outline of linesegments, each line segment having two endpoints and a plurality ofpoints; for each of the line segments, performing steps comprising:determining a movement direction for the line segment, where themovement direction is based on an exterior of the outline of linesegments, where the exterior of the outline of line segments isdetermined based on a winding order, where the winding order isdetermined based on cross products of a plurality of vector pairs, andwhere each vector pair is two vectors that intersect at an extrema pointof the outline of line segments; and translating the line segment in themovement direction by a distance, where translating comprises movingeach point of the line segment in a same direction by a same distance;after translating the line segments, rejoining pairs of adjacent linesegments, where rejoining a pair of adjacent line segments comprises: ifthe adjacent line segments do not intersect, extending the endpoints ofone or both of the line segments until the line segments join at anintersection point that is an endpoint of each of the line segments ofthe pair; and if the adjacent line segments do intersect, trimming theendpoints of one or both of the line segments until the line segmentsjoin at an intersection point that is an endpoint of each of the linesegments of the pair; determining a synthetic bold or synthetic lightscaled outline of the glyph from the translated and rejoined linesegments.
 18. The computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein: themovement direction is perpendicular to the line segment.
 19. Thecomputer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein: the movement direction isclassified as one of a predetermined set of cardinal directions, and thedistance which the line segment is translated is based on aclassification of the movement direction.
 20. The computer-readablemedium of claim 19, wherein: the cardinal directions are up, down, left,right, between up and right, between up and left, between down and left,and between down and right.
 21. The computer-readable medium of claim17, wherein: the distance which a line segment is translated isrepresented by a horizontal component and a vertical component, and theline segment is translated by moving each endpoint of the line segmentby the horizontal component and by the vertical component.
 22. Thecomputer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein generating the outline ofline segments includes: generating from the glyph an initial outline;scaling the initial outline in accordance with the size to generate ascaled outline; and changing any curve of the scaled outline to one ormore line segments.
 23. The computer-readable medium of claim 22,wherein determining the synthetic bold or synthetic light scaled outlineincludes: changing each line segment in the translated and rejoined linesegments that were previously converted from a curve back to therespective curve.
 24. The computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein:the distance which a line segment is translated is based on adisplacement number that is calculated as a function of scaled stemwidth or size.
 25. The computer-readable medium of claim 24, wherein:the function is for one of optical compensation, producing a boldappearance, or producing a light appearance.
 26. The computer-readablemedium of claim 24, wherein calculation of the displacement numberincludes: calculating an initial displacement number for producing abold appearance or for producing a light appearance; calculating aninitial displacement number for optical compensation, the calculating ofthe initial displacement number for optical compensation accounting forthe initial displacement number for producing a bold appearance or forproducing a light appearance; and combining the initial displacementnumber for producing a bold appearance or for producing a lightappearance with the initial displacement number for optical compensationto obtain the displacement number.
 27. The computer-readable medium ofclaim 17, wherein the method further comprises: determining whether arejoining of two line segments has violated one or more constraints,wherein the rejoining produces an intersection point that is theintersection of the two line segments, the intersection being anendpoint for each of the line segments; and when the rejoining isdetermined to have violated the one or more constraints, adjusting theposition of the intersection point.
 28. The computer-readable medium ofclaim 27, wherein: the one or more constraints require that an endpointof a translated line segment be within a predetermined distance from theendpoint's pre-translated position.
 29. The computer-readable medium ofclaim 27, wherein: the one or more constraints are based on a miterlimit.
 30. The computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the methodfurther comprises: generating a bitmap from the synthetic bold orsynthetic light scaled outline.
 31. The computer-readable medium ofclaim 30, wherein: determining the synthetic bold or synthetic lightscaled outline of the glyph and generating the bitmap are performed by arasterizer during rendering, the rasterizer being a component of arenderer.
 32. The computer-readable medium of claim 31, wherein themethod further comprises: using a downsampler to downsample the bitmap,the downsampler being a component of the renderer.
 33. A systemcomprising: a computer-readable medium comprising a program product; adisplay device; and one or more processors operable to interact with thedisplay device and to execute the program product and perform operationscomprising: receiving a glyph to be rendered at a size; generating fromthe glyph an outline of line segments, each line segment having twoendpoints and a plurality of points; for each of the line segments,performing steps comprising: determining a movement direction for theline segment, where the movement direction is determined based on anexterior of the outline of line segments, where the exterior of theoutline of line segments is determined based on a winding order, wherethe winding order is determined based on cross products of a pluralityof vector pairs, and where each vector pair is two vectors thatintersect at an extrema point of the outline of line segments; andtranslating the line segment in the movement direction by a distance,where translating comprises moving each point of the line segment in asame direction by a same distance; after translating the line segments,rejoining pairs of adjacent line segments, where rejoining a pair ofadjacent line segments comprises: if the adjacent line segments do notintersect, extending the endpoints of one or both of the line segmentsuntil the line segments join at an intersection point that is anendpoint of each of the line segments of the pair; and if the adjacentline segments do intersect, trimming the endpoints of one or both of theline segments until the line segments join at an intersection point thatis an endpoint of each of the line segments of the pair; determining asynthetic bold or synthetic light scaled outline of the glyph from thetranslated and rejoined line segments.
 34. The system of claim 33,wherein: the movement direction is perpendicular to the line segment.35. The system of claim 33, wherein: the movement direction isclassified as one of a predetermined set of cardinal directions, and thedistance which the line segment is translated is based on aclassification of the movement direction.
 36. The system of claim 35,wherein: the cardinal directions are up, down, left, right, between upand right, between up and left, between down and left, and between downand right.
 37. The system of claim 33, wherein: the distance which aline segment is translated is represented by a horizontal component anda vertical component, and the line segment is translated by moving eachendpoint of the line segment by the horizontal component and by thevertical component.
 38. The system of claim 33, wherein generating theoutline of line segments includes: generating from the glyph an initialoutline; scaling the initial outline in accordance with the size togenerate a scaled outline; and changing any curve of the scaled outlineto one or more line segments.
 39. The system of claim 38, whereindetermining the synthetic bold or synthetic light scaled outlineincludes: changing each line segment in the translated and rejoined linesegments that were previously converted from a curve back to therespective curve.
 40. The system of claim 33, wherein: the distancewhich a line segment is translated is based on a displacement numberthat is calculated as a function of scaled stem width or size.
 41. Thesystem of claim 40, wherein: the function is for one of opticalcompensation, producing a bold appearance, or producing a lightappearance.
 42. The system of claim 40, wherein calculation of thedisplacement number includes: calculating an initial displacement numberfor producing a bold appearance or for producing a light appearance;calculating an initial displacement number for optical compensation, thecalculating of the initial displacement number for optical compensationaccounting for the initial displacement number for producing a boldappearance or for producing a light appearance; and combining theinitial displacement number for producing a bold appearance or forproducing a light appearance with the initial displacement number foroptical compensation to obtain the displacement number.
 43. The systemof claim 33, wherein the operations further comprise: determiningwhether a rejoining of two line segments has violated one or moreconstraints, wherein the rejoining produces an intersection point thatis the intersection of the two line segments, the intersection being anendpoint for each of the line segments; and when the rejoining isdetermined to have violated the one or more constraints, adjusting theposition of the intersection point.
 44. The system of claim 43, wherein:the one or more constraints require that an endpoint of a translatedline segment be within a predetermined distance from the endpoint'spre-translated position.
 45. The system of claim 43, wherein: the one ormore constraints are based on a miter limit.
 46. The system of claim 33,wherein the operations further comprise: generating a bitmap from thesynthetic bold or synthetic light scaled outline.
 47. The system ofclaim 46, wherein the operations further comprise: determining thesynthetic bold or synthetic light scaled outline of the glyph andgenerating the bitmap are performed by a rasterizer during rendering,the rasterizer being a component of a renderer.
 48. The system of claim47, wherein the operations further comprise: using a downsampler todownsample the bitmap, the downsampler being a component of therenderer.